Tuesday, 8 November 2011

Bridgend Show Utter Contempt

I attended a public meeting last night organised by Plaid's Bethan Jenkins AM and local party activists in Bridgend, to clarify what has been going on in Bridgend Council. As with all Councils in Wales, they have been going through a combination of a job evaluation and also a process called 'single status.' Both processes basically looking at the roles that workers do and how to pay more fairly for them, negotiations meeting the expectations of 30 year old equality legislation. Both sets of negotiations are fraught with difficulties, which is why all Councils have gone out of their way to consult at every stage and handle their staff with as much respect and sensitivity as possible - well nearly all Councils apart from the 3 Labour controlled ones that is.

Labour controlled Neath Port Talbot were the first to show 'bully-boy' tactics by threatening their staff with redundancy notices unless they signed new contracts with a pay cut for all, much to the disgust of the unions. Then followed Rhondda Cynon Taf who were even more bullying in their tactics and threats to staff; the Labour leadership claiming that there was no other way. Funny that, as all the Welsh non Labour controlled Council had found 'another way' without resorting to such underhand actions.

However, the prize for the most incompetent, insensitive and mind-blowing stupid approach to these negotiations has to go to Labour controlled Bridgend Council. If I had to arrange a row of boxes to tick in how NOT to handle job evaluation and single status, then not only have Bridgend ticked all the boxes, but even added a few extra.

I went to the public meeting last night preparing for difficult stories but wanting to counteract some very reasonable concerns with an honest appraisal of how difficult it is to deal with these legal issues, but that approach soon went out of the window. I was struggling to find anything that Bridgend Council had done that I could defend. How the hell did they get this so fundamentally wrong? Just to list a few clangers that they have dropped: -

  • There is no back pay for employees who will get a pay rise due to the deal (they are entitled to up to 4 years).
  • There is no pay protection at all for employees facing a pay cut.
  • They have removed altogether pay enhancements for overtime, unsocial hours etc, when they were supposed to simplify and make the system equal - not non-existent.
  • They have managed to concoct a pay formula that will mean some employees facing a 50% pay cut.
  • They have declined to borrow cash through the Welsh Government to pay for issues such as back pay, despite many other Welsh Authorities doing so.
  • They appear not to have saved any reserves to afford pay protection for any period of claiming, in contrast to other Welsh Authorities.

The list goes on and on, with some horror stories last night from workers not knowing where to turn. Interestingly, Bethan Jenkins was berated by this Council for previously holding meetings about the closure of local care homes and not inviting them along. She invited them last night, but they didn't turn up. I wonder why? Well, the packed hall that did turn up were absolutely outraged by their treatment, particularly when they realised that Bridgend have had alternative options and have just not chosen them. It became clear as the evening wore on, that the Council in August decided for reasons only known to themselves to jump 12 months or so of further negotiations - just to 'move things along'.

So what can be done to sort out this mess? Well for starters, Bridgend Council can accept that it has made mistakes, take a step back and make some meaningful concessions to the exasperated trade union officials trying to negotiate with them. They have to go to the Government and borrow cash to alleviate the distress caused by their callous actions and above all, they need to start showing some compassion to public sector workers who are already getting a kicking off the Westminster Government. The Labour Councillors running Bridgend appear to be passing the buck to the Officers, effectively admitting that they are incapable of running the place. Likewise, the senior officers have lost the trust of many of their staff, with their  inconceivability inept handling of the whole process.

I shall be re-visiting this topic over the coming weeks in the hope that the unions can get through to the individuals running Bridgend Council, that treating your staff with utter contempt is not necessarily the way to achieve high morale and better public services. Carwyn. What was that about 'standing up for Wales'. Well, how about standing up for your constituency, even if it does mean criticising your own party?

8 comments:

  1. Before 2004 an initial £1 million was set aside for job evaluation by my administration and we also agreed that a union official from Uison woul be seconded fulltime to ensure that the agreement would be in place by April 2007. For soem reason it seems that no progress was made after I left local government. I even told the Council in my final speech that along with Leisure it was the issue that needed to be tackled in the next Council term. On the back pay to argue that there will be no payment is frankly nonsense. It was clear even before 2004 that the Councl should be budgeting for at least 6 years and I began to put money into balances for that purpose. The Rainbow alliance then started to use the balances to keep the council tax increases below a certain figure. What has now happened is that the Council officers have panicked because they know that they are goign to be taken to the cleaners in a number of industrial tribunal cases. They went for broke and the tactic has blown up in their face.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I remember reading in a past issue of the council newspaper "Buletin" that they had a £3m pot earmarked for job evaluation settlements.

    So what happened to that money?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The current Labour administration have put by I believe £15 million for the almost 2000 cases served against them on equal pay issues. This is of course separate to back pay for all facing a pay rise. There is always an option for them to make an early offer to employees who have served legal papers against them and then use any monies over for back pay or even pay protection. This together with capitalisation through the Welsh Government, could make a real difference. They also need to urgently re-visit two other areas, payments for unsocial hours and overtime and the issue of Teaching Assistants. In Bridgend, TA's are facing the double whammy of going on term time hours (a 25% pay cut) and down-grading due to job evaluation. Many will face pay cuts they cannot afford and quite how the Foundain Phase will be maintained without adequate TA numbers, is anyone's guess. We also need to remember that this is happening in the First Minister's backyard. If he cabnnot sort out a local difficulty. what exactly is he going to do for Wales in the next 5 years?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ian I thought that you supported local government. What's this issue got to do with the First Minister or any other AM for that matter?

    ReplyDelete
  5. You know I do Jeff, but the Labour Councillors in Bridgend have passed the buck to the Officers and in doing so, are making many workers' lives hell. The main funding option here is through Carwyn's Govt, so there is an obvious area of mutual interest. Bridgend desperately needs new blood in the Council, but their employees cannot wait until next Summer for new faces to find their feet. They need support now but sadly, their Labour controlling Councillors are not interested.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why is the Chief Executive so quiet on this issue? Because she is too busy applying for other jobs, not with any success. Cardiff, and Cambden in London last week. Why don't they want her?

    ReplyDelete
  7. My understandig is that the funding for back pay is only available when agreement has been reached. Even then it is borrowed money which has to be paid back with interest. In 2007 this would have been an easy option.In the present financial climate it isn't that easy. Bridgend faces £21.6 million worth of cuts in the first two years of the new Council. To reach the 85% delegation to schools the Council will also have to delegate another £8.6 million. Whatever the merits or otherwise of the exercise it is a case study on how not to introduce policy change. It's a classic example of officers' not having the political nous to understand the possible political fallout from a policy decision. At the same time it is also clear that many members including those who now say thye are on the side of the staff also not realising the full implications of the decisions they approved in full Council on April 6th of this year.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jeff,
    I believe that you are correct in your assumption on capitalisation, but the door is still very much open for this and several Councils have I believe taken them up on it, including Cardiff very recently. As you have previously stated, all Councils and officers have known this was coming for years and must also realise the pressure that Council staff are currently under with pay freezes, potential pension cuts and huge changes to their service areas due to funding cuts.

    Job evaluation is no bed of roses for any Council and along with single status changes, is a real headache for Local Government. However, when most Councils have worked very closely with unions and done their best to mitigate inevitable salary changes, others appear to have seen it as an opportunity to save cash. Sadly, Bridgend falls under the latter and to date, is by far the worst Council in Wales in its treatment of staff. RCT was bad, but Bridgend is on another level altogether.
    I only hope that even at this late stage, the Officers realise their folly, swallow their pride and re-visit their agenda-for the sake of not only the workers of Bridgend Council, but the many communities who rely on their efforts.

    ReplyDelete